🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple businesses who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like much of our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.