🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.