🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.